All certifications

FARM Animal Care

ANIMAL WELFARE

Rigor
1/5
Independence
1/5
Enforcement
3/5
Weight in a score
0.5/10

CONFIDENCE HIGH · ANALYSIS ONLY, NOT AN AUDIT OR CERTIFICATION

Our read

The decisive fact about FARM Animal Care is coverage. The programme's own figure is that more than 99% of the US milk supply comes from participating farms. A dairy brand holding it is distinguished from almost no one, and treating it as a differentiator misreads it. It is better understood as the floor for selling milk in the United States than as a mark of leadership. The second fact is who runs it. FARM is administered by the National Milk Producers Federation, the dairy industry's own trade association; final standards are voted by the NMPF Board of Directors, made up of representatives from NMPF member cooperatives. Routine evaluations are second-party: FARM states plainly that it does not employ evaluators, and applicants must first secure employment or a contract with a FARM participant, meaning the milk buyer's own staff or contractors assess its suppliers. Neither evaluations nor third-party verifications are ever unannounced, and verification covers a random sample rather than all farms. Where the programme is stronger than its reputation is the sanction ladder, which is published and specific and ends in Conditional Decertification and delisting of a buyer that keeps purchasing. But mandatory items allow nine months and the animal-outcome benchmarks allow three years. It carries no environmental content whatsoever; that sits in a separate FARM program area.

What it covers

  • one of five FARM program areas: Animal Care, Antibiotic Stewardship, Biosecurity, Environmental Stewardship, Workforce Development
  • second-party on-farm evaluation at least once every three years
  • standards revised on a three-year cycle; Version 5 in force 1 July 2024 to 31 December 2027
  • one Immediate Action standard: compliance with the ban on routine tail docking
  • Mandatory Corrective Action Plan items: written VCPR, herd health plan, pre-weaned calf protocol, disbudding with pain mitigation before eight weeks, non-ambulatory animal protocol, euthanasia protocol, fitness-for-transport protocol, feed and water access, signed cow care agreement, continuing education
  • Continuous Improvement Plan animal-outcome benchmarks for body condition, hock, knee, locomotion and broken tails
  • graded corrective action ladder ending in Conditional Decertification, with participants delisted for continuing to buy from a decertified facility
  • third-party verification of a random sample, selected every six months, by a contracted auditing firm (FSNS C&A)

What it leaves out

Not a criticism of the scheme. A standard is a scope, and this is where this one ends.

  • no environmental scope: no emissions, packaging or land use requirements in Animal Care
  • no greenhouse gas measurement in this program area; GHG sits in the separate FARM Environmental Stewardship program area
  • no manure or nutrient management criteria in Animal Care
  • no packaging or recyclability criteria
  • no stocking density or space allowance per animal
  • no outdoor access, grazing or pasture requirement
  • no prohibition on tie stalls or year-round indoor housing
  • no unannounced visits: 'Evaluations are not to be conducted unannounced' and 'Verifications are never conducted unannounced'
  • no published register of decertifications, delistings or sanction outcomes
  • third-party verification sample percentage not published
  • no published fee schedule; participation is arranged through the milk buyer, not the farm

The scheme

Issued byNational Dairy FARM Program, administered by the National Milk Producers Federation (NMPF); created in 2009 by NMPF with Dairy Management, Inc.
Where it appliesUnited States
Audit and renewalSecond-party evaluation at least once every three years; standards revised every three years (Version 5 active 1 July 2024 to 31 December 2027); third-party verification sample drawn every six months from facilities evaluated in the previous six months
CostNot published

What we read

FARM Animal Care Version 5, approved by the NMPF Board of Directors June 2023, in force 1 July 2024 to 31 December 2027; Animal Care Reference Manual Version 5 (2023) and Animal Care FAQ, governance and evaluator pages as at July 2026

What we could not establish

The Animal Care Reference Manual Version 5 PDF is 65 MB and could not be retrieved for full reading in this pass; the standard content cited is from the FARM Animal Care Version 5 corrective-actions page, which enumerates the Immediate Action, MCAP and CIP standards in full, plus the Animal Care FAQ, governance and evaluator pages. Could not establish: the third-party verification sample percentage — FARM describes it only as 'a representative percentage of participating facilities each year' and does not publish the figure on any public page reviewed; any fee schedule; or the number of Conditional Decertifications issued, which is not published. nationaldairyfarm.com and nmpf.org block direct HTTP fetches (403), so all pages were read through a browser session. No peer-reviewed or NGO critique of FARM was sourced within this pass, so the assessment rests on the programme's own published documentation rather than on external evaluation; the independence and rigor scores follow from FARM's own statements about who administers it, who evaluates, and what share of the milk supply participates.

Who holds it

Scored companies carrying this mark, highest first. Holding it is not the same as scoring well — the mark is one input of six.

CompanyScope heldYKO score
Fairlife Not stated 15.5

If you hold this certification, it is already on your record. What a buyer cannot see there yet is the evidence behind the parts this standard does not reach.

Have ours built — free See who holds what