FARM Animal Care
ANIMAL WELFARE
CONFIDENCE HIGH · ANALYSIS ONLY, NOT AN AUDIT OR CERTIFICATION
Our read
The decisive fact about FARM Animal Care is coverage. The programme's own figure is that more than 99% of the US milk supply comes from participating farms. A dairy brand holding it is distinguished from almost no one, and treating it as a differentiator misreads it. It is better understood as the floor for selling milk in the United States than as a mark of leadership. The second fact is who runs it. FARM is administered by the National Milk Producers Federation, the dairy industry's own trade association; final standards are voted by the NMPF Board of Directors, made up of representatives from NMPF member cooperatives. Routine evaluations are second-party: FARM states plainly that it does not employ evaluators, and applicants must first secure employment or a contract with a FARM participant, meaning the milk buyer's own staff or contractors assess its suppliers. Neither evaluations nor third-party verifications are ever unannounced, and verification covers a random sample rather than all farms. Where the programme is stronger than its reputation is the sanction ladder, which is published and specific and ends in Conditional Decertification and delisting of a buyer that keeps purchasing. But mandatory items allow nine months and the animal-outcome benchmarks allow three years. It carries no environmental content whatsoever; that sits in a separate FARM program area.
What it covers
- one of five FARM program areas: Animal Care, Antibiotic Stewardship, Biosecurity, Environmental Stewardship, Workforce Development
- second-party on-farm evaluation at least once every three years
- standards revised on a three-year cycle; Version 5 in force 1 July 2024 to 31 December 2027
- one Immediate Action standard: compliance with the ban on routine tail docking
- Mandatory Corrective Action Plan items: written VCPR, herd health plan, pre-weaned calf protocol, disbudding with pain mitigation before eight weeks, non-ambulatory animal protocol, euthanasia protocol, fitness-for-transport protocol, feed and water access, signed cow care agreement, continuing education
- Continuous Improvement Plan animal-outcome benchmarks for body condition, hock, knee, locomotion and broken tails
- graded corrective action ladder ending in Conditional Decertification, with participants delisted for continuing to buy from a decertified facility
- third-party verification of a random sample, selected every six months, by a contracted auditing firm (FSNS C&A)
What it leaves out
Not a criticism of the scheme. A standard is a scope, and this is where this one ends.
- no environmental scope: no emissions, packaging or land use requirements in Animal Care
- no greenhouse gas measurement in this program area; GHG sits in the separate FARM Environmental Stewardship program area
- no manure or nutrient management criteria in Animal Care
- no packaging or recyclability criteria
- no stocking density or space allowance per animal
- no outdoor access, grazing or pasture requirement
- no prohibition on tie stalls or year-round indoor housing
- no unannounced visits: 'Evaluations are not to be conducted unannounced' and 'Verifications are never conducted unannounced'
- no published register of decertifications, delistings or sanction outcomes
- third-party verification sample percentage not published
- no published fee schedule; participation is arranged through the milk buyer, not the farm
The scheme
| Issued by | National Dairy FARM Program, administered by the National Milk Producers Federation (NMPF); created in 2009 by NMPF with Dairy Management, Inc. |
|---|---|
| Where it applies | United States |
| Audit and renewal | Second-party evaluation at least once every three years; standards revised every three years (Version 5 active 1 July 2024 to 31 December 2027); third-party verification sample drawn every six months from facilities evaluated in the previous six months |
| Cost | Not published |
What we read
FARM Animal Care Version 5, approved by the NMPF Board of Directors June 2023, in force 1 July 2024 to 31 December 2027; Animal Care Reference Manual Version 5 (2023) and Animal Care FAQ, governance and evaluator pages as at July 2026
- yko_assessment and rigor_score — near-universal coverage — MORE THAN 99% of the U.S. milk supply comes from farms participating in the FARM Animal Care Program.
- issuer and programme structure — Launched in 2009, the FARM Program was created by the National Milk Producers Federation in partnership with Dairy Management, Inc. ... The FARM Program focuses on five program areas – Animal Care, Antibiotic Stewardship, Biosecurity, Envir
- independence_score — standards set and approved by the industry trade association — The NMPF Board of Directors, made up of representatives from NMPF member cooperatives, votes on the final standards and recommendations set forth by the respective task forces.
- independence_score — evaluators are employed by the milk buyer, not by FARM — Please note: FARM does not employ evaluators. Individuals who wish to become certified evaluators should first secure employment or a contract with a FARM program participant.
- renewal_period and what_it_omits — three-year cycle, never unannounced — Facilities participating in FARM Animal Care Program must undergo a second-party evaluation at least once every three years. Evaluations are not to be conducted unannounced.
- what_it_covers — third-party verification sample mechanism — Every six months, a random sample of all eligible facilities is selected from a pool of the facilities that were evaluated during the previous six months. Verifications are then scheduled with each farm owner and will occur no less than 60
- what_it_covers — verification is contracted to an auditing firm — The National Dairy FARM Program contracts with an auditing firm to facilitate the FARM Animal Care Program verification process.
- what_it_covers — identity of the contracted verifier — FSNS C&A Staff — Valerie Smith, DVM, Director of Livestock Audit Services, plus twelve Livestock Audit Specialists and programme staff
- what_it_covers — the single Immediate Action standard — Immediate Action — Requires that the standard is met immediately. ... The facility complies with the ban on routine tail docking
- enforcement_score — the sanction ladder — A program participant will be delisted from FARM if they continue to procure milk from a 'Conditionally Decertified' facility.
- enforcement_score — long compliance windows — Mandatory Corrective Action Plans | MCAP — Requires that the standard is met within nine (9) months or less ... Continuous Improvement Plan | CIP — Requires that action has been taken to meet the standard within a minimum of three (3) years
- rigor_score — animal-outcome benchmarks are Continuous Improvement items with wide tolerances — Locomotion | 15% or less of the lactating herd score 2 on the FARM Locomotion Scorecard; Locomotion | 5% or less of the lactating herd score 3 on the FARM Locomotion Scorecard
- what_it_omits — emissions sit in a separate program area, not in Animal Care — Today, FARM ES focuses on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and Nutrient Management Plans. ... Does the FARM ES evaluation need to be conducted on-site? No.
- rigor_score — participation is voluntary and organised by the buyer — Participating in the FARM Animal Care program is not required by law. Milk cooperatives, processors individual farms, and other organizations with dairy farm members elect to participate in the FARM Animal Care program on behalf of their me
What we could not establish
The Animal Care Reference Manual Version 5 PDF is 65 MB and could not be retrieved for full reading in this pass; the standard content cited is from the FARM Animal Care Version 5 corrective-actions page, which enumerates the Immediate Action, MCAP and CIP standards in full, plus the Animal Care FAQ, governance and evaluator pages. Could not establish: the third-party verification sample percentage — FARM describes it only as 'a representative percentage of participating facilities each year' and does not publish the figure on any public page reviewed; any fee schedule; or the number of Conditional Decertifications issued, which is not published. nationaldairyfarm.com and nmpf.org block direct HTTP fetches (403), so all pages were read through a browser session. No peer-reviewed or NGO critique of FARM was sourced within this pass, so the assessment rests on the programme's own published documentation rather than on external evaluation; the independence and rigor scores follow from FARM's own statements about who administers it, who evaluates, and what share of the milk supply participates.
Who holds it
Scored companies carrying this mark, highest first. Holding it is not the same as scoring well — the mark is one input of six.
| Company | Scope held | YKO score |
|---|---|---|
| Fairlife | Not stated | 15.5 |
If you hold this certification, it is already on your record. What a buyer cannot see there yet is the evidence behind the parts this standard does not reach.